It's not up to me to ask the New York Daily News, and other publications for that matter, why they have women writing about the dresses and the clothing worn by famous women.
As you guys can tell, this writer makes a big deal about the open back, which is of minimal significance to us:
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/05/03/2011-05-03_met_gala_2011_renee_zellwegers_backbones_thin_frame_distract_from_gorgeous_carol.html
I would have reviewed this dress much differently. I don't really care about what her spine and her back have coming out. My reaction is that the sides don't go out far enough toward the shoulder, which means that guys have no opportunity to see down from behind her shoulder and see any boobage. The lowest point is still well above the top of her butt crack, and it appears there is a big enough margin even when she sits down.
The front of the dress is thin enough that we can tell it has a thick built-in bra, so we won't even get any nipple prints.
Even if one of these steps were taken (the lack of a bra or wider at the upper back), we would have a more attractive dress.
Furthermore, she should have worn her hair down. It would have been much sexier to have her long hair dangling over the bare back.
Those are the reasons not to "replicate" this dress, rather than those the writer points out. I'm no fashion expert, but at least I can cater to what guys like. And that's who should be looking and reviewing!
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
The Return
OK, I’m back. After a few weeks dedicated to my “real” job, it is with great enthusiasm that I return to my “Total Creep” status on a regular basis once again. And with a few changes that I’m sure guys of all ages will enjoy.
As you know, this blog started in conjunction with the release of my Audio Book “Total Creep – A Guy’s Guide” more than 2 years ago. It was an opportunity to encourage and respond to readers/listeners’ questions and experiences, especially about how they successfully used what they learned from the book.
Now, 2 years later, the book did even better financially for me than I expected. Yes, it’s still available (www.TotalCreep.com) , and in fact there are a couple of updated segments I recorded late in 2010. But at this point in time, I’m now doing this blog way more because of how much I enjoy checking out the babes, rather than to encourage book sales. While the responses, mostly from readers/listeners have been enjoyable, for the most part (even from some of the women), it’s time to open things up.
I’ll be posting some updates and thoughts on some of what I see (from checking out babes), some of my updated suggestions, and, of course, responding to questions and posting success stories submitted by guys like you. Whether you have my book or not. In addition, I will do some analysis of attempts which are not successful, including when they happen to me. Even after nearly 40 years of checking out every possible attractive babe, I still have occasion to want to kick myself for a missed opportunity or a wrong move.
I encourage you to comment and to e-mail me with your questions, comments, and successful experiences. As many of you know, I do not publish last names or cities. A “Joe from PA” is the most specific I get. If you prefer I not use any of your comments verbatim, please let me know. It’s just that the more information we have to help each other, the better this will be.
Keep in mind that I use my best judgment to protect specific locations so it doesn’t ruin it for other guys. One example took place a few months ago when a fellow total creep told us about a beach location where he could be up on a hill hiding between some trees and see the area where the babes can shower. Thinking they were protected from view by the wooded area behind and above them, he was (and more importantly, still is) able to watch some babes change out of their tops and sometimes bottoms.
While I’m sure every straight guy within 100 miles of that location would love to know exactly where that is, we obviously can’t post it on here, and we don’t want a group of guys seen going up on that hill, or that opportunity would be over. What I did was post some ideas about how the guy found the location and how he managed to keep hidden from view. (At least as of his last “report”.) He still likes to e-mail me about some of what he sees, and how a few of the babes probably wouldn’t care if they knew he was watching them. I’m probably going to publish more about that in the weeks to come, but not the exact location. In this case, I have given “Jerry” some tips he has found helpful, and in return I am now aware of the specific location and have scheduled to visit there during June when I know the weather will be warm enough to have a lot of babes around.
Of course, your “experiences” are not limited to the beaches, the malls, the schools, and other public places. I enjoy the success stories of “the babe across the street 2 floors down who leaves her bedroom blinds open at night” and sneak peeks in private places.
More to come. It’s great to be back!
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Celebrating Fat Tuesday The Best Possible Way !!
For those looking for something to celebrate:
http://blogs.westword.com/showandtell/2011/03/tonight_fat_tuesday_diamond_cabaret.php
And it's something guys enjoy even more than the nice young ladies who participate!
If this works well, they should expand to "Fat Week" next year.
http://blogs.westword.com/showandtell/2011/03/tonight_fat_tuesday_diamond_cabaret.php
And it's something guys enjoy even more than the nice young ladies who participate!
If this works well, they should expand to "Fat Week" next year.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Guys Taking Risks To Catch A Naked Babe
The things guys risk to see a naked babe! Sometimes you need to think it through before you act. Here are a few stories which made news over the past 10 days:
This guy is a landlord, who got caught with a video cam recording a certain tenant, including when she had some friends over:
And this guy was an Army officer, nailed using a telephoto lens for what turned out to be a 16-year old babe. Obviously, she didn't look 16 to him:
While this guy went out of control and actually went into a women's locker room:
Talk about not thinking things through. This guy peeked under a stall door at a babe in the women's bathroom in a restaurant. His bigger mistake was having paid for his meal with his charge card, which, obviously, led to his arrest:
Although many a guy has tried to check out a babe in a hotel room, your chances of getting away with it are better if you don't use a construction ladder to do so, like this guy did:
Then there was this guy, who wanted to see his "Target" babe and was caught with a camera for her dressing room:
This guy is a landlord, who got caught with a video cam recording a certain tenant, including when she had some friends over:
This guy was caught snapping photos from underneath the curtains of a babe changing clothes in a dressing room:
And this guy was an Army officer, nailed using a telephoto lens for what turned out to be a 16-year old babe. Obviously, she didn't look 16 to him:
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/8866932.Jail_for_Peeping_Tom_former_army_officer/
Then this dude left his phone with a video cam in too obvious of a location in a tanning salon:
Then this dude left his phone with a video cam in too obvious of a location in a tanning salon:
While this guy went out of control and actually went into a women's locker room:
http://www.examiner.com/adoptive-families-in-dayton/peeping-tom-at-local-target-store
Many women still don't realize how many guys want to see naked babes, and what they are willing to do to see them. Believe me, I don't want these guys around either. They ruin it for the rest of the guys who know the "safe" ways to check out the babes.
Many women still don't realize how many guys want to see naked babes, and what they are willing to do to see them. Believe me, I don't want these guys around either. They ruin it for the rest of the guys who know the "safe" ways to check out the babes.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Naked people found in stopped truck
To those who say there is nothing to do in Nebraska:
http://www.ketv.com/r/26980298/detail.html
No word in this story about the ages of the babes, however.
http://www.ketv.com/r/26980298/detail.html
No word in this story about the ages of the babes, however.
Friday, February 11, 2011
How do police identify the victims?
Another of those stories about careless guys who get caught checking out the babes. But this one claims that a dozen of the victims were identified from this guy's photos supposedly looking up skirts.
Got to wonder how the police do that? And who is the lucky one to get that job?
http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/local/court_peeping_tom_used_phone_to_film_women_1_2396624
But, ooops, this guy was doing this while at work? Oh, brother.
Actually, he did this with a heavy risk of being caught right out in the open. The technology hurt him rather than helped. That is so often what gets guys in trouble.
When working, and is the vast majority of situations, you can't have anything that could be used as evidence against you when checking out the babes.
Many years ago, I took a part-time job in a clothing store (for both men and women). While I knew that I wouldn't be able to look by the women's dressing room while working in the shopping areas, I was able to scout for when a hot babe would be heading back to try something on. As luck had it, a couple of the dressing booths were at the back corner, which backed up to a wooden wall to the storage room in back.
During my shift, I would try to keep the light off in the back storage room. Someone else who had or did work there also thought like me, and had drilled a small peep hole into both of the dressing booths. From checking angles after the store had closed, I knew that if the storage room light was off, anyone who noticed the hole in the wall (which was up by a corner) could not see any light.
When my work permitted, I would be able to see when a hottie would go into one of the two "visible" booths to try on, and then "just happen" to go back to the storage area to retrieve an item. Of course, I knew exactly where to go and quietly climb the step ladder and get my view into that booth. Only once did I get a babe not wearing a bra, so it was more than 99% bra and panties. Unless you count one babe that pulled her panties about half way down in back and gave me a lot of butt crack while trying on shorts.
But it made the workday a lot more fun.
My point is that I could have had a camera running the whole time that no one would have seen, and then probably edited down to the hot babes. Yet, having done so would have put in the risk of being discovered and arrested. Even if the babes were down to less than underwear, I knew never to take the risk of having any evidence.
Otherwise, if that peep hole was discovered, I could easily have either denied any knowledge or proven where the items were that were necessary for my job there.
By not having any evidence, I was able to add some nice sights to my workday. This guy in the store who got busted could have done a lot better. He could have been restocking while simply looking down a top or the back of a babe squatting over nearby. If she turned around, he could have dropped an item on the floor or appeared to be looking at his inventory sheet. But since he has his camera phone, he was stuck.
Guys like that ruin it for guys like us.
Got to wonder how the police do that? And who is the lucky one to get that job?
http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/local/court_peeping_tom_used_phone_to_film_women_1_2396624
But, ooops, this guy was doing this while at work? Oh, brother.
Actually, he did this with a heavy risk of being caught right out in the open. The technology hurt him rather than helped. That is so often what gets guys in trouble.
When working, and is the vast majority of situations, you can't have anything that could be used as evidence against you when checking out the babes.
Many years ago, I took a part-time job in a clothing store (for both men and women). While I knew that I wouldn't be able to look by the women's dressing room while working in the shopping areas, I was able to scout for when a hot babe would be heading back to try something on. As luck had it, a couple of the dressing booths were at the back corner, which backed up to a wooden wall to the storage room in back.
During my shift, I would try to keep the light off in the back storage room. Someone else who had or did work there also thought like me, and had drilled a small peep hole into both of the dressing booths. From checking angles after the store had closed, I knew that if the storage room light was off, anyone who noticed the hole in the wall (which was up by a corner) could not see any light.
When my work permitted, I would be able to see when a hottie would go into one of the two "visible" booths to try on, and then "just happen" to go back to the storage area to retrieve an item. Of course, I knew exactly where to go and quietly climb the step ladder and get my view into that booth. Only once did I get a babe not wearing a bra, so it was more than 99% bra and panties. Unless you count one babe that pulled her panties about half way down in back and gave me a lot of butt crack while trying on shorts.
But it made the workday a lot more fun.
My point is that I could have had a camera running the whole time that no one would have seen, and then probably edited down to the hot babes. Yet, having done so would have put in the risk of being discovered and arrested. Even if the babes were down to less than underwear, I knew never to take the risk of having any evidence.
Otherwise, if that peep hole was discovered, I could easily have either denied any knowledge or proven where the items were that were necessary for my job there.
By not having any evidence, I was able to add some nice sights to my workday. This guy in the store who got busted could have done a lot better. He could have been restocking while simply looking down a top or the back of a babe squatting over nearby. If she turned around, he could have dropped an item on the floor or appeared to be looking at his inventory sheet. But since he has his camera phone, he was stuck.
Guys like that ruin it for guys like us.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
a pregnant pause
I have had some letters from guys over the past couple of years about checking out pregnant babes, but the guy in this news story seems to have taken it to another extreme:
http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/va_beach/police-arrest-vb-peeping-tom
It's tough to determine why the guy wanted to see her naked while at full pregnancy and to go to that extent to do so. My only guess is that the babe must have smaller boobs (not his preference) and he figured this was his chance to see them at their best. Of course, that doesn't make what he did right.
The story also reports that he had also videotaped her the day before. I'm thinking he must not have gotten a good shot of her if he went back again the next day. This means that if he did get a good shot of her naked the day before, he would have gotten away with it had he not gone back the very next day.
This one is tough since he was a direct neighbor.
Some guys actually do not enjoy seeing pregnant babes naked all that much, based on the e-mails and comments I have received from guys since my book came out, and from what I know while talking to friends about it over the years.
Personally, I'll admit I wasn't much for it while in my teens and 20's, but over the past 20+ years I have come to appreciate and enjoy the pregnant naked body just as much. It usually does mean better boobage. Of course, during the couple of times I have been able to spy on pregnant babes while at home, it gets difficult to see bush while she is in the later stage because of the hang of the tummy. That is both while walking around or when seated. But it's a nice trade off due to the increased boobage.
However, I don't know the age of the guys who e-mailed me about it, and I'd like to know more about if it is guys over 30 who enjoy seeing pregnant babes naked moreso than 20's or teens. Any thoughts, guys?
(And don't worry, I won't use any names. Just your age and your comments, with your permission.)
http://www.wavy.com/dpp/news/local_news/va_beach/police-arrest-vb-peeping-tom
It's tough to determine why the guy wanted to see her naked while at full pregnancy and to go to that extent to do so. My only guess is that the babe must have smaller boobs (not his preference) and he figured this was his chance to see them at their best. Of course, that doesn't make what he did right.
The story also reports that he had also videotaped her the day before. I'm thinking he must not have gotten a good shot of her if he went back again the next day. This means that if he did get a good shot of her naked the day before, he would have gotten away with it had he not gone back the very next day.
This one is tough since he was a direct neighbor.
Some guys actually do not enjoy seeing pregnant babes naked all that much, based on the e-mails and comments I have received from guys since my book came out, and from what I know while talking to friends about it over the years.
Personally, I'll admit I wasn't much for it while in my teens and 20's, but over the past 20+ years I have come to appreciate and enjoy the pregnant naked body just as much. It usually does mean better boobage. Of course, during the couple of times I have been able to spy on pregnant babes while at home, it gets difficult to see bush while she is in the later stage because of the hang of the tummy. That is both while walking around or when seated. But it's a nice trade off due to the increased boobage.
However, I don't know the age of the guys who e-mailed me about it, and I'd like to know more about if it is guys over 30 who enjoy seeing pregnant babes naked moreso than 20's or teens. Any thoughts, guys?
(And don't worry, I won't use any names. Just your age and your comments, with your permission.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)